Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS

6 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 5 GHz2024

Popular choices:

i5-13400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • +7.8% higher PassMark.
  • +25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (23,227 vs 25,029).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS better than Core i5-13400F?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS is ahead with a 9.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F pulls ahead with 7.8% better PassMark. Core i5-13400F also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 7.8% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 9.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core i5-13400F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 7.8% better PassMark. Core i5-13400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 8645HS
1080p
low171 FPS265 FPS
medium158 FPS239 FPS
high132 FPS204 FPS
ultra112 FPS174 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS232 FPS
medium123 FPS190 FPS
high99 FPS157 FPS
ultra84 FPS137 FPS
4K
low81 FPS158 FPS
medium74 FPS130 FPS
high59 FPS102 FPS
ultra46 FPS88 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 8645HS
1080p
low545 FPS426 FPS
medium464 FPS358 FPS
high389 FPS314 FPS
ultra356 FPS275 FPS
1440p
low458 FPS371 FPS
medium403 FPS325 FPS
high345 FPS288 FPS
ultra301 FPS244 FPS
4K
low280 FPS268 FPS
medium247 FPS240 FPS
high231 FPS224 FPS
ultra204 FPS187 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 8645HS
1080p
low530 FPS581 FPS
medium449 FPS581 FPS
high415 FPS581 FPS
ultra375 FPS581 FPS
1440p
low490 FPS581 FPS
medium422 FPS581 FPS
high382 FPS522 FPS
ultra343 FPS446 FPS
4K
low393 FPS492 FPS
medium331 FPS431 FPS
high296 FPS369 FPS
ultra246 FPS303 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 8645HS
1080p
low626 FPS581 FPS
medium626 FPS581 FPS
high626 FPS581 FPS
ultra626 FPS581 FPS
1440p
low626 FPS581 FPS
medium626 FPS581 FPS
high598 FPS581 FPS
ultra521 FPS581 FPS
4K
low535 FPS581 FPS
medium492 FPS548 FPS
high439 FPS490 FPS
ultra382 FPS426 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS

The Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,227 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS's 23,227 — a 7.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS.

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 8645HS
Cores / Threads
10 / 16+67%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
5 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
4.3 GHz+72%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+25%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
25,029+8%
23,227
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 8645HS
Socket
LGA1700
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 8645HS
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming