PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅+16.9% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (21,408 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS

2024

Why buy it

✅+16.9% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (21,408 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS better than Core i5-13400F?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS is ahead with a 13.8% average FPS lead across 8 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F pulls ahead with 16.9% better PassMark. Core i5-13400F also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 16.9% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 13.8% average FPS lead across 8 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core i5-13400F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 16.9% better PassMark. Core i5-13400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS
1080p
low	171 FPS	262 FPS
medium	158 FPS	238 FPS
high	132 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	173 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	230 FPS
medium	123 FPS	189 FPS
high	99 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	136 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	156 FPS
medium	74 FPS	130 FPS
high	59 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	88 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS
1080p
low	545 FPS	374 FPS
medium	464 FPS	314 FPS
high	389 FPS	278 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	240 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	316 FPS
medium	403 FPS	276 FPS
high	345 FPS	251 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	212 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	237 FPS
medium	247 FPS	211 FPS
high	231 FPS	197 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	164 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS
1080p
low	530 FPS	535 FPS
medium	449 FPS	535 FPS
high	415 FPS	535 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	535 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	535 FPS
medium	422 FPS	535 FPS
high	382 FPS	511 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	437 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	482 FPS
medium	331 FPS	415 FPS
high	296 FPS	355 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	293 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS
1080p
low	626 FPS	535 FPS
medium	626 FPS	535 FPS
high	626 FPS	535 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	535 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	535 FPS
medium	626 FPS	535 FPS
high	598 FPS	535 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	535 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	535 FPS
medium	492 FPS	531 FPS
high	439 FPS	473 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	411 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS

The Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,408 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS's 21,408 — a 15.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.9 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.5 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+25%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark	25,029+17%	21,408
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS
Socket	LGA1700	FP7
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.