PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $188 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
✅Delivers 35.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 94.3 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 36,230).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700

2023

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 94.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).

Core i5-13400F

2023

Core i7-13700

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $188 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
✅Delivers 35.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 94.3 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 36,230).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 94.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700 better than Core i5-13400F?

Yes. Core i7-13700 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting 44.8% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700 is the better fit because it leads the single-thread side of the matchup with 13% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700 is the better fit. You are getting 44.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-13700 is 95.9% more expensive on MSRP at $384 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you 44.8% higher PassMark. Core i5-13400F is also 35.3% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 94.3 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 10/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-13700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-13700
1080p
low	171 FPS	264 FPS
medium	158 FPS	254 FPS
high	132 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	181 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	225 FPS
medium	123 FPS	193 FPS
high	99 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	135 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	154 FPS
medium	74 FPS	131 FPS
high	59 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	90 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-13700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-13700
1080p
low	545 FPS	343 FPS
medium	464 FPS	293 FPS
high	389 FPS	247 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	225 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	298 FPS
medium	403 FPS	264 FPS
high	345 FPS	224 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	192 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	176 FPS
medium	247 FPS	160 FPS
high	231 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	133 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-13700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-13700
1080p
low	530 FPS	647 FPS
medium	449 FPS	530 FPS
high	415 FPS	467 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	405 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	590 FPS
medium	422 FPS	491 FPS
high	382 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	370 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	433 FPS
medium	331 FPS	373 FPS
high	296 FPS	338 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	289 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-13700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-13700
1080p
low	626 FPS	906 FPS
medium	626 FPS	851 FPS
high	626 FPS	735 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	660 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	799 FPS
medium	626 FPS	712 FPS
high	598 FPS	615 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	542 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	548 FPS
medium	492 FPS	497 FPS
high	439 FPS	444 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	388 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-13700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i7-13700

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i7-13700

The Core i7-13700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 36,230 points. Launch price was $384.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-13700 offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700 — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i7-13700's 36,230 — a 36.6% lead for the Core i7-13700. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-13700
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	16 / 24+60%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.2 GHz+13%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+19%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	25,029	36,230+45%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Z790,B760 (Core i7-13700).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-13700
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	192 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i7-13700 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-13700 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-13700
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700 debuted at $384. On MSRP ($196 vs $384), the Core i5-13400F is $188 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 94.3 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700 — making the Core i5-13400F the 30% better value option.