
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Core i7-12850HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-12850HX.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12850HX across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 30,596).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core i7-12850HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
Core i7-12850HX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Core i7-12850HX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-12850HX.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12850HX across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 30,596).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core i7-12850HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12850HX better than Core i5-13400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-12850HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-12850HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 120 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-12850HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 616 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 462 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 416 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 314 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-12850HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 765 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 597 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 742 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 658 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 566 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 364 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i7-12850HX

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i7-12850HX
Core i7-12850HX
The Core i7-12850HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,596 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-12850HX offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-12850HX has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-12850HX — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-12850HX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-12850HX uses Alder Lake-HX (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i7-12850HX's 30,596 — a 20% lead for the Core i7-12850HX. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12850HX.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-12850HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 16 / 24+60% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+19% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Alder Lake-HX (2022) |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 30,596+22% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-12850HX uses FCBGA1964 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-12850HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1964 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-12850HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i7-12850HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-12850HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core i7-12850HX targets Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-12850HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | Mobile Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













