PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $127 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $323 MSRP).
✅Delivers 168.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 47.7 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $323 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-11700T

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 750, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,393 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.7 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($323 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Core i7-11700T

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $127 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $323 MSRP).
✅Delivers 168.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 47.7 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $323 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 750, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,393 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.7 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($323 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i7-11700T?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 6.8% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data, 62.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 6.8% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 62.6% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $127 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $323 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.8% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 168.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 47.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i7-11700T can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-11700T Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-11700T
1080p
low	171 FPS	189 FPS
medium	158 FPS	155 FPS
high	132 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	151 FPS
medium	123 FPS	120 FPS
high	99 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	85 FPS
medium	74 FPS	73 FPS
high	59 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	46 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-11700T

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-11700T
1080p
low	545 FPS	277 FPS
medium	464 FPS	227 FPS
high	389 FPS	204 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	181 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	244 FPS
medium	403 FPS	206 FPS
high	345 FPS	185 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	159 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	170 FPS
medium	247 FPS	147 FPS
high	231 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	121 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-11700T

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-11700T
1080p
low	530 FPS	385 FPS
medium	449 FPS	385 FPS
high	415 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	385 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	385 FPS
medium	422 FPS	385 FPS
high	382 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	385 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	385 FPS
medium	331 FPS	364 FPS
high	296 FPS	327 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	262 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-11700T

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-11700T
1080p
low	626 FPS	385 FPS
medium	626 FPS	385 FPS
high	626 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	385 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	385 FPS
medium	626 FPS	385 FPS
high	598 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	385 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	385 FPS
medium	492 FPS	385 FPS
high	439 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	385 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-11700T

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i7-11700T

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i7-11700T

The Core i7-11700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,393 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-11700T offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i7-11700T — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-11700T uses Rocket Lake (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i7-11700T's 15,393 — a 47.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,497, a 46.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-11700T.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-11700T
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+79%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+25%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Rocket Lake (2021)
PassMark	25,029+63%	15,393
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+61%	1,497
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-11700T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-11700T — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and H510,B560,H570,Z590,Q570 (Core i7-11700T).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-11700T
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i7-11700T supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-11700T). The Core i7-11700T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 750), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core i7-11700T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core i7-11700T rivals Ryzen 7 5700G.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-11700T
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD Graphics 750
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming	Low Power Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core i7-11700T debuted at $323. On MSRP ($196 vs $323), the Core i5-13400F is $127 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 47.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-11700T — making the Core i5-13400F the 91.3% better value option.