
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Core i5-13500H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+7.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13500H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13500H across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core i5-13500H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13500H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13500H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.3% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,116 vs 16,211).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Core i5-13500H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+7.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13500H.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.3% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13500H across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core i5-13500H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13500H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,116 vs 16,211).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i5-13500H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13500H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13500H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 527 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 527 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 321 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 224 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13500H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 527 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 527 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 527 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 527 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 498 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 527 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 370 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13500H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 527 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 527 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 527 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 527 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 527 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 527 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 527 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 500 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 431 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i5-13500H

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i5-13500H
Core i5-13500H
The Core i5-13500H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,080 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-13500H offers 12 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13500H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.7 GHz on the Core i5-13500H — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13500H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-13500H uses Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i5-13500H's 21,080 — a 17.1% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 15,116 (7% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,400, a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 11,500 (0.8% advantage for the Core i5-13500H). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-13500H.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13500H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 12 / 16+20% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.7 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+11% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 25,029+19% | 21,080 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211+7% | 15,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | 2,400 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | 11,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-13500H uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 28 (Core i5-13500H) — the Core i5-13500H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13500H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+100% | 96 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13500H). The Core i5-13500H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 80EU), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core i5-13500H targets High performance laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core i5-13500H rivals Ryzen 7 7735HS.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13500H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming | High performance laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













