
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Core i5-13490F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $39 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $235 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 113.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $235 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13490F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 16,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
Core i5-13490F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 113.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($235 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
Core i5-13400F
2023Core i5-13490F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $39 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $235 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 113.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $235 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13490F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 16,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 113.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($235 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13490F better than Core i5-13400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13490F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13490F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 377 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 316 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 296 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 215 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13490F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 667 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 667 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 667 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 667 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 667 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 667 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 667 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 596 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 376 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13490F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 667 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 667 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 667 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 667 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 667 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 667 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 667 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 592 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i5-13490F

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i5-13490F
Core i5-13490F
The Core i5-13490F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 26,670 points. Launch price was $235.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-13400F and Core i5-13490F share an identical 10-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13490F — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-13490F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i5-13490F's 26,670 — a 6.3% lead for the Core i5-13490F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 16,500 (1.8% advantage for the Core i5-13490F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,844, a 26.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 11,200 (1.8% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13490F.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13490F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 10 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 26,670+7% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | 16,500+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407+31% | 1,844 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408+2% | 11,200 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and B660,B760,H610,H670,Z690,Z790 (Core i5-13490F).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13490F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13490F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core i5-13490F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13490F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core i5-13490F debuted at $235. On MSRP ($196 vs $235), the Core i5-13400F is $39 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 113.5 pts/$ for the Core i5-13490F — making the Core i5-13400F the 11.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13490F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-17% | $235 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+13% | 113.5 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













