
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 110W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅170.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌46.7% higher power demand at 110W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 110W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅170.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌46.7% higher power demand at 110W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 101 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 845 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 692 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 623 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 498 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 569 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 492 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 462 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 478 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 410 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 249 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,119 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 22,119 — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU leads by 181.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 22,119+181% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 6144+586% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 26.73 TFLOPS+796% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 192+243% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 6 MB+582% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 48 MB+4700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has 12 GB. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 237.5% advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 432 GB/s+238% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 48 MB+4700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs AV1,H.265,H.264 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | AV1,H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 110W — a 37.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-32% | 110W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 150W-50% |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 229mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 201.1+92% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | AD104 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #323 | #47 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













