G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,350 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 853.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Duo: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Duo is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 75W instead of 350W, a 275W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Duo across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Radeon Pro Duo

2016

Why buy it

✅38.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
906% HIGHER MSRP
$1,499 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌366.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Radeon Pro Duo

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,350 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 853.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Duo: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Duo is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 75W instead of 350W, a 275W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅38.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Duo across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
906% HIGHER MSRP
$1,499 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌366.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro Duo better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. Radeon Pro Duo is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 38.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data, 5.5% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2016 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro Duo is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon Pro Duo is about 906.0% more expensive on MSRP at $1,499 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 38.8% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 5.5% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does GeForce GTX 1650 make more sense than Radeon Pro Duo?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 350W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $149 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro Duo. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro Duo currently gives you 5.5% higher G3D Mark and 38.8% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro Duo Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro Duo
1080p
low	94 FPS	120 FPS
medium	83 FPS	103 FPS
high	70 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	59 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	97 FPS
medium	74 FPS	81 FPS
high	60 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	43 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	43 FPS
medium	39 FPS	37 FPS
high	27 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon Pro Duo

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro Duo
1080p
low	136 FPS	243 FPS
medium	113 FPS	207 FPS
high	94 FPS	165 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	133 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	175 FPS
medium	62 FPS	147 FPS
high	44 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	96 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	98 FPS
medium	27 FPS	83 FPS
high	21 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	52 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon Pro Duo

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro Duo
1080p
low	323 FPS	373 FPS
medium	283 FPS	299 FPS
high	205 FPS	249 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	187 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	280 FPS
medium	202 FPS	224 FPS
high	151 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	140 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	187 FPS
medium	117 FPS	149 FPS
high	79 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	93 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon Pro Duo

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro Duo
1080p
low	261 FPS	237 FPS
medium	211 FPS	206 FPS
high	191 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	142 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	180 FPS
medium	158 FPS	160 FPS
high	135 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	105 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	104 FPS
medium	74 FPS	87 FPS
high	65 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	55 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon Pro Duo

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon Pro Duo

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon Pro Duo

The Radeon Pro Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,299 points. Launch price was $1,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon Pro Duo's 8,299 — the Radeon Pro Duo leads by 5.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro Duo uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Duo). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8.192 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Duo). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro Duo
G3D Mark Score	7,869	8,299+5%
Architecture	Turing	GCN 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896	4096 ×2+357%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	8.192 TFLOPS ×2+175%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+67%	1000 MHz
ROPs	32	64 ×2+100%
TMUs	56	256 ×2+357%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	1 MB+14%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Duo relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro Duo
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Duo has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro Duo offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro Duo) — the Radeon Pro Duo has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro Duo
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro Duo). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro Duo
DirectX	12	12.0
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro Duo). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro Duo).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro Duo
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	VCE 3.4
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro Duo's 350W — a 129.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Radeon Pro Duo). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro Duo
TDP	75W-79%	350W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	240mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+343%	23.7

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Duo launched at $1499. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 90.1% less ($1350 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.5 (Radeon Pro Duo) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 860% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).