GeForce GTX 1650 vs L2

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+43.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1832% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 275W, a 200W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.

L2

2023

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,467 vs 7,869).
❌
1242.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌266.7% higher power demand at 275W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

L2

2023

Why buy it

✅+43.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1832% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 275W, a 200W reduction.

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,467 vs 7,869).
❌
1242.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌266.7% higher power demand at 275W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than L2?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 43.9% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2019 instead of 2023, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

L2 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 5nm process instead of 12nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is about $1,851 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $2,000 MSRP, and you are getting 43.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 1832%. L2 is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does L2 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. L2 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $2,000 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1650. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1650 currently gives you 43.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 1832%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

L2 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	L2
1080p
low	94 FPS	202 FPS
medium	83 FPS	190 FPS
high	70 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	119 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	180 FPS
medium	74 FPS	148 FPS
high	60 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	88 FPS
medium	39 FPS	76 FPS
high	27 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open L2

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	L2
1080p
low	136 FPS	246 FPS
medium	113 FPS	197 FPS
high	94 FPS	164 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	123 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	185 FPS
medium	62 FPS	148 FPS
high	44 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	123 FPS
medium	27 FPS	98 FPS
high	21 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	62 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open L2

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	L2
1080p
low	323 FPS	246 FPS
medium	283 FPS	197 FPS
high	205 FPS	164 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	123 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	185 FPS
medium	202 FPS	148 FPS
high	151 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	123 FPS
medium	117 FPS	98 FPS
high	79 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	62 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open L2

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	L2
1080p
low	261 FPS	246 FPS
medium	211 FPS	197 FPS
high	191 FPS	164 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	123 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	185 FPS
medium	158 FPS	148 FPS
high	135 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	123 FPS
medium	74 FPS	98 FPS
high	65 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	62 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open L2

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and L2

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

L2

The L2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 16 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 11776 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 92 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,467 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the L2's 5,467 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 43.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the L2 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11,776 (L2). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 59.35 TFLOPS (L2). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2520 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	L2
G3D Mark Score	7,869+44%	5,467
Architecture	Turing	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896	11776+1214%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	59.35 TFLOPS+1889%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2520 MHz+51%
ROPs	32	128+300%
TMUs	56	368+557%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	11.5 MB+1207%
L2 Cache	1 MB	96 MB+9500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The L2 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	L2
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 96 MB (L2) — the L2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	L2
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	96 MB+9500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12_2 (L2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	L2
DirectX	12	12_2
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 8th Gen (L2). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (L2).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	L2
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 8th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	NVDEC 5th Gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the L2's 275W — a 114.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (L2). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	L2
TDP	75W-73%	275W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	168mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+427%	19.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the L2 launched at $2000. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 92.5% less ($1851 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.7 (L2) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1855.6% better value. The L2 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).