GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel Arc Pro B50

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Intel Arc Pro B50

2025Core: 1700 MHzBoost: 2600 MHz

Popular choices:

••••GTX 1650•••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB 75

7,869

0.0%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Intel Arc Pro B50

8 GB 70

12,208

+55.1%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Delivers 51% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 12,208).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌37.1% longer card at 229mm vs 167mm.

Intel Arc Pro B50

2025

Why buy it

✅+55.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Measures 167mm instead of 229mm, a 62mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌
134.2% HIGHER MSRP
$349 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Intel Arc Pro B50

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Delivers 51% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅+55.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Measures 167mm instead of 229mm, a 62mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 12,208).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌37.1% longer card at 229mm vs 167mm.

Trade-offs

❌
134.2% HIGHER MSRP
$349 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Intel Arc Pro B50 better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. Intel Arc Pro B50 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 12,208 vs 7,869 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Intel Arc Pro B50 is a 2025 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Intel Arc Pro B50 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019, 55.1% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Intel Arc Pro B50 is about 134.2% more expensive on MSRP at $349 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 55.1% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Intel Arc Pro B50 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1650 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $149 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Intel Arc Pro B50 earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Intel Arc Pro B50 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Intel Arc Pro B50
1080p
low	94 FPS	80 FPS
medium	83 FPS	58 FPS
high	70 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	29 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	63 FPS
medium	74 FPS	37 FPS
high	60 FPS	24 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	16 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	35 FPS
medium	39 FPS	21 FPS
high	27 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	11 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Intel Arc Pro B50

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Intel Arc Pro B50
1080p
low	136 FPS	185 FPS
medium	113 FPS	135 FPS
high	94 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	63 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	107 FPS
medium	62 FPS	70 FPS
high	44 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	40 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	44 FPS
medium	27 FPS	32 FPS
high	21 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	21 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Intel Arc Pro B50

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Intel Arc Pro B50
1080p
low	323 FPS	549 FPS
medium	283 FPS	439 FPS
high	205 FPS	366 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	275 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	412 FPS
medium	202 FPS	330 FPS
high	151 FPS	275 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	206 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	275 FPS
medium	117 FPS	220 FPS
high	79 FPS	183 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	137 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Intel Arc Pro B50

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Intel Arc Pro B50
1080p
low	261 FPS	549 FPS
medium	211 FPS	439 FPS
high	191 FPS	366 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	275 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	412 FPS
medium	158 FPS	330 FPS
high	135 FPS	275 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	206 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	275 FPS
medium	74 FPS	220 FPS
high	65 FPS	183 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	137 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Intel Arc Pro B50

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Intel Arc Pro B50

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel Arc Pro B50

The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 12,208 — the Intel Arc Pro B50 leads by 55.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Intel Arc Pro B50 uses Xe2, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2600 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Intel Arc Pro B50
G3D Mark Score	7,869	12,208+55%
Architecture	Turing	Xe2
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896	2048+129%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	10.65 TFLOPS+257%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2600 MHz+56%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56	128+129%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro B50 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Intel Arc Pro B50
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 has 8 GB. The Intel Arc Pro B50 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Intel Arc Pro B50
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Intel Arc Pro B50
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs Dual Arc Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Intel Arc Pro B50
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	Dual Arc Media Engine
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	Dual Arc Media Engine
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 70W — a 6.9% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Intel Arc Pro B50
TDP	75W	70W-7%
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	167mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	104.9	174.4+66%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 launched at $349. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 57.3% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 50.9% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).