
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 5070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 245mm, a 16mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 5070
2025Why buy it
- ✅203.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌268.5% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019GeForce RTX 5070
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 245mm, a 16mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅203.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌268.5% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5070 better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 325 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 223 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 105 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 293 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 799 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 663 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 594 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 532 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 535 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 420 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 289 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 5070

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 5070
GeForce RTX 5070
The GeForce RTX 5070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 4 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2325 MHz to 2512 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,854 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 5070's 28,854 — the GeForce RTX 5070 leads by 266.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 5070 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6,144 (GeForce RTX 5070). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 30.87 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5070). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2512 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 28,854+267% |
| Architecture | Turing | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 6144+586% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 30.87 TFLOPS+935% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2512 MHz+51% |
| ROPs | 32 | 80+150% |
| TMUs | 56 | 192+243% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 6 MB+582% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 48 MB+4700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5070 is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5070 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 5070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 5070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5070) — a 425% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5070. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 5070) — the GeForce RTX 5070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 672 GB/s+425% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 48 MB+4700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5070). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5070). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC (6th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC (9th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC (6th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 5070's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 5070). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 229mm vs 245mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 229mm | 245mm |
| Height | 111mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-3% | 72°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 115.4+10% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 5070 launched at $549. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 72.9% less ($400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 52.6 (GeForce RTX 5070) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 0.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 5070 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-73% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8 | 52.6 |
| Codename | TU117 | GB205 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | March 4 2025 |
| Ranking | #323 | #22 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













