G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,450 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 174.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 19.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 425W, a 350W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 304mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

GeForce RTX 4090 D

2023

Why buy it

✅291.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
973.2% HIGHER MSRP
$1,599 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌466.7% higher power demand at 425W vs 75W.
❌32.8% longer card at 304mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

GeForce RTX 4090 D

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,450 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 174.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 19.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 425W, a 350W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 304mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅291.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌
973.2% HIGHER MSRP
$1,599 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌466.7% higher power demand at 425W vs 75W.
❌32.8% longer card at 304mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4090 D better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4090 D is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4090 D averages 291.2% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 30,725 vs 7,869 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4090 D is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4090 D is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, 290.5% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 24 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4090 D is about 973.2% more expensive on MSRP at $1,599 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 291.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 290.5% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, GeForce RTX 4090 D is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1650 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $149 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, GeForce RTX 4090 D earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 4090 D Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4090 D
1080p
low	94 FPS	284 FPS
medium	83 FPS	263 FPS
high	70 FPS	225 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	197 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	262 FPS
medium	74 FPS	217 FPS
high	60 FPS	173 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	156 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	180 FPS
medium	39 FPS	150 FPS
high	27 FPS	114 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	102 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open GeForce RTX 4090 D

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4090 D
1080p
low	136 FPS	841 FPS
medium	113 FPS	657 FPS
high	94 FPS	516 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	449 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	673 FPS
medium	62 FPS	548 FPS
high	44 FPS	443 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	364 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	375 FPS
medium	27 FPS	314 FPS
high	21 FPS	286 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	240 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open GeForce RTX 4090 D

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4090 D
1080p
low	323 FPS	944 FPS
medium	283 FPS	772 FPS
high	205 FPS	699 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	604 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	731 FPS
medium	202 FPS	598 FPS
high	151 FPS	529 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	452 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	506 FPS
medium	117 FPS	419 FPS
high	79 FPS	377 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	317 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open GeForce RTX 4090 D

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4090 D
1080p
low	261 FPS	999 FPS
medium	211 FPS	971 FPS
high	191 FPS	855 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	691 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	830 FPS
medium	158 FPS	728 FPS
high	135 FPS	641 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	518 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	606 FPS
medium	74 FPS	538 FPS
high	65 FPS	461 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	346 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open GeForce RTX 4090 D

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 4090 D

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 4090 D

The GeForce RTX 4090 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 28 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2280 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 14592 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 425W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 114 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,725 points. Launch price was $1,599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 4090 D's 30,725 — the GeForce RTX 4090 D leads by 290.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4090 D uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 14,592 (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 73.54 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2520 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4090 D
G3D Mark Score	7,869	30,725+290%
Architecture	Turing	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896	14592+1529%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	73.54 TFLOPS+2364%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2520 MHz+51%
ROPs	32	176+450%
TMUs	56	456+714%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	14.3 MB+1525%
L2 Cache	1 MB	72 MB+7100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 D is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4090 D supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4090 D
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4090 D has 24 GB. The GeForce RTX 4090 D offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090 D) — a 687.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 D. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 72 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 D) — the GeForce RTX 4090 D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4090 D
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	24 GB+500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	1008 GB/s+688%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	1 MB	72 MB+7100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4090 D
DirectX	12	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2x NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4090 D).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4090 D
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	2x NVENC (8th Gen)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	NVDEC (5th Gen)
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4090 D's 425W — a 140% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 850W (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 78°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4090 D
TDP	75W-82%	425W
Recommended PSU	300W-65%	850W
Power Connector	None	16-pin
Length	229mm	304mm
Height	111mm	137mm
Slots	2-33%	3
Temp (Load)	70°C-10%	78°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+45%	72.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4090 D launched at $1599. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 90.7% less ($1450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 19.2 (GeForce RTX 4090 D) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 175% better value. The GeForce RTX 4090 D is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).