G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 17.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 304mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅+242.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
302% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.9 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
❌32.8% longer card at 304mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 17.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 304mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅+242.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌
302% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.9 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
❌32.8% longer card at 304mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 7,869 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, 242.1% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is about 302.0% more expensive on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 242.1% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, GeForce RTX 4070 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1650 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $149 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, GeForce RTX 4070 earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	117 FPS	226 FPS
medium	104 FPS	213 FPS
high	86 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	64 FPS	149 FPS
1440p
low	108 FPS	187 FPS
medium	92 FPS	157 FPS
high	73 FPS	136 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	45 FPS	99 FPS
medium	42 FPS	84 FPS
high	29 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	62 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open GeForce RTX 4070

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	140 FPS	569 FPS
medium	116 FPS	476 FPS
high	96 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	313 FPS
1440p
low	80 FPS	358 FPS
medium	63 FPS	291 FPS
high	44 FPS	236 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	199 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	175 FPS
medium	27 FPS	142 FPS
high	20 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	99 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open GeForce RTX 4070

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	354 FPS	999 FPS
medium	283 FPS	969 FPS
high	236 FPS	808 FPS
ultra	177 FPS	606 FPS
1440p
low	263 FPS	909 FPS
medium	212 FPS	727 FPS
high	177 FPS	606 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	454 FPS
4K
low	153 FPS	537 FPS
medium	141 FPS	449 FPS
high	100 FPS	392 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	303 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open GeForce RTX 4070

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	284 FPS	814 FPS
medium	231 FPS	665 FPS
high	208 FPS	576 FPS
ultra	177 FPS	529 FPS
1440p
low	213 FPS	654 FPS
medium	169 FPS	535 FPS
high	144 FPS	458 FPS
ultra	120 FPS	412 FPS
4K
low	105 FPS	409 FPS
medium	80 FPS	347 FPS
high	70 FPS	318 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	285 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open GeForce RTX 4070

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 4070

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 242.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2475 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4070
G3D Mark Score	7,869	26,919+242%
Architecture	Turing	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896	5888+557%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	29.15 TFLOPS+877%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2475 MHz+49%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	184+229%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	5.8 MB+559%
L2 Cache	1 MB	36 MB+3500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4070
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 293.8% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4070
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	12 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	504 GB/s+294%
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB	36 MB+3500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4070
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4070
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce RTX 4070
TDP	75W-63%	200W
Recommended PSU	300W-54%	650W
Power Connector	None	8-pin
Length	229mm	304mm
Height	111mm	137mm
Slots	2-33%	3
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	104.9	134.6+28%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 75.1% less ($450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 17.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).