
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅57.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅57.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 410 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 328 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 137 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 398 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,144 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU's 12,144 — the GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU leads by 54.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 12,144+54% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2560+186% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 9.098 TFLOPS+205% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1777 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 80+43% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 2.5 MB+184% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU) — the GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 192 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU's 130W — a 53.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 82°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-42% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-15% | 82°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+12% | 93.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | GA106 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #323 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













