
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $850 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 145.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2080 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 11 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2018Why buy it
- ✅161.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅175% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (11 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌570.5% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $850 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 145.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅161.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅175% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (11 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2080 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 11 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌570.5% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2080 Ti better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1650 make more sense than GeForce RTX 2080 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 312 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 264 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 81 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 866 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 703 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 541 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 363 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 457 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 242 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 534 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 500 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 236 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 68 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,513 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti's 21,513 — the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti leads by 173.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 13.45 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1545 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 21,513+173% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 4352+386% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 13.45 TFLOPS+351% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+8% | 1545 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 88+175% |
| TMUs | 56 | 272+386% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 4.3 MB+389% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 5.5 MB+450% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti has 11 GB. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti offers 175% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 616 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) — a 381.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 352-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.5 MB (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 11 GB+175% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 616 GB/s+381% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 352-bit+175% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 5.5 MB+450% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 116mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+22% | 86.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti launched at $999. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 85.1% less ($850 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 21.5 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 145.6% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-85% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+146% | 21.5 |
| Codename | TU117 | TU102 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | September 20 2018 |
| Ranking | #323 | #66 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













