GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce MX570

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅15.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 38.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 38.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌200% higher power demand at 75W vs 25W.

GeForce MX570

2022

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 25W instead of 75W, a 50W reduction.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌
0.7% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

GeForce MX570

2022

Why buy it

✅15.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 38.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 38.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 25W instead of 75W, a 50W reduction.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌200% higher power demand at 75W vs 25W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌
0.7% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than GeForce MX570?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 15.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 37.1% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2019 instead of 2022, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce MX570 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 8nm process instead of 12nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is about $1 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and you are getting 15.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 37.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 38.1%. GeForce MX570 is the newer 2022 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (25W vs 75W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does GeForce MX570 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. GeForce MX570 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (25W vs 75W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $150 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1650. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1650 currently gives you 37.1% higher G3D Mark and 15.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 38.1%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GeForce MX570 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce MX570
1080p
low	94 FPS	81 FPS
medium	83 FPS	69 FPS
high	70 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	37 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	71 FPS
medium	74 FPS	62 FPS
high	60 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	28 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	26 FPS
medium	39 FPS	24 FPS
high	27 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open GeForce MX570

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce MX570
1080p
low	136 FPS	160 FPS
medium	113 FPS	129 FPS
high	94 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	74 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	118 FPS
medium	62 FPS	91 FPS
high	44 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	53 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	68 FPS
medium	27 FPS	54 FPS
high	21 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	29 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open GeForce MX570

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce MX570
1080p
low	323 FPS	258 FPS
medium	283 FPS	207 FPS
high	205 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	129 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	194 FPS
medium	202 FPS	155 FPS
high	151 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	97 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	129 FPS
medium	117 FPS	103 FPS
high	79 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	65 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open GeForce MX570

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce MX570
1080p
low	261 FPS	137 FPS
medium	211 FPS	113 FPS
high	191 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	80 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	103 FPS
medium	158 FPS	86 FPS
high	135 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	61 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	62 FPS
medium	74 FPS	49 FPS
high	65 FPS	39 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	30 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open GeForce MX570

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce MX570

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce MX570

The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce MX570's 5,738 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 37.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce MX570 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,048 (GeForce MX570). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1155 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce MX570
G3D Mark Score	7,869+37%	5,738
Architecture	Turing	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	896	2048+129%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	4.731 TFLOPS+59%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+44%	1155 MHz
ROPs	32	40+25%
TMUs	56	64+14%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	2 MB+127%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce MX570
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (GeForce MX570) — the GeForce MX570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce MX570
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s+33%	96 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce MX570's 25W — a 100% difference. The GeForce MX570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce MX570). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce MX570
TDP	75W	25W-67%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9	229.5+119%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce MX570 launched at $150. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 0.7% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 38.3 (GeForce MX570) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 37.9% better value. The GeForce MX570 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).