
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 125W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 12,692).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅+61.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 125W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 125W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+61.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 12,692).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 125W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 571 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 241 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 92 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,692 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER's 12,692 — the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER leads by 61.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1785 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 12,692+61% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1408+57% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 5.027 TFLOPS+68% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1785 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 56 | 88+57% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 1.4 MB+59% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — a 162.5% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 336 GB/s+163% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER's 125W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-40% | 125W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-33% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+3% | 101.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER launched at $229. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 34.9% less ($80 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 55.4 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER offers 4.9% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-35% | $229 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8 | 55.4+5% |
| Codename | TU117 | TU116 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | October 29 2019 |
| Ranking | #323 | #207 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













