
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 5060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 145W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 52.8 vs 69.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 5060
2025Why buy it
- ✅145.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 32% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 69.7 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌93.3% higher power demand at 145W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019GeForce RTX 5060
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 145W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅145.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 32% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 69.7 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 52.8 vs 69.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌93.3% higher power demand at 145W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5060 better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 835 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 676 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 594 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 639 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 289 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 234 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 743 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 608 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 532 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 362 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 234 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 5060

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 5060
GeForce RTX 5060
The GeForce RTX 5060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2280 MHz to 2497 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 145W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,836 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 5060's 20,836 — the GeForce RTX 5060 leads by 164.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 5060 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,840 (GeForce RTX 5060). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 19.18 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5060). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2497 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 20,836+165% |
| Architecture | Turing | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 3840+329% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 19.18 TFLOPS+543% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2497 MHz+50% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 56 | 120+114% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 3.8 MB+332% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 32 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5060 is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5060 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 5060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 5060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5060) — a 250% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 5060) — the GeForce RTX 5060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 448 GB/s+250% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 32 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5060). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 9th gen (GeForce RTX 5060). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 6th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC 9th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC 6th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 5060's 145W — a 63.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 5060). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-48% | 145W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-33% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 65°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 143.7+37% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 5060 launched at $299. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 50.2% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 69.7 (GeForce RTX 5060) — the GeForce RTX 5060 offers 32% better value. The GeForce RTX 5060 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-50% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8 | 69.7+32% |
| Codename | TU117 | GB206 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | May 19 2025 |
| Ranking | #323 | #69 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













