
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4090
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,350 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 100.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 23.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 450W, a 320W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 304mm, a 69mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4090 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4090
2022Why buy it
- ✅149.4% more average FPS across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌542.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,599 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌246.2% higher power demand at 450W vs 130W.
- ❌29.4% longer card at 304mm vs 235mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022GeForce RTX 4090
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,350 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 100.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 23.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 450W, a 320W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 304mm, a 69mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅149.4% more average FPS across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4090 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌542.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,599 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌246.2% higher power demand at 450W vs 130W.
- ❌29.4% longer card at 304mm vs 235mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4090 better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 102 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 910 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 726 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 567 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 478 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 728 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 607 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 335 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 265 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 944 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 772 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 699 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 604 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 731 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 317 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 971 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 855 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 764 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 830 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 728 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 641 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 420 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and GeForce RTX 4090

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4090
The GeForce RTX 4090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38,112 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the GeForce RTX 4090's 38,112 — the GeForce RTX 4090 leads by 220.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4090 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 16,384 (GeForce RTX 4090). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 128 (GeForce RTX 4090) with 80 Tensor cores vs 512.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 38,112+220% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 16384+540% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 82.58 TFLOPS+819% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2520 MHz+44% |
| ROPs | 32 | 176+450% |
| TMUs | 80 | 512+540% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 16 MB+540% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 72 MB+3500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 128+540% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 512+540% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4090 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4090 has 24 GB. The GeForce RTX 4090 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090) — a 350% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 72 MB (GeForce RTX 4090) — the GeForce RTX 4090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 1008 GB/s+350% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 72 MB+3500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4090). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4090). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4090).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the GeForce RTX 4090's 450W — a 110.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1000W (GeForce RTX 4090). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 235mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-71% | 450W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-55% | 1000W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 235mm | 304mm |
| Height | 124mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+8% | 84.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4090 launched at $1599. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 84.4% less ($1350 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 23.8 (GeForce RTX 4090) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-84% | $1599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+101% | 23.8 |
| Codename | GA106 | AD102 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | September 20 2022 |
| Ranking | #224 | #4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













