
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 160W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 240mm, a 5mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 47.8 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅70.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 18.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 130W.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 160W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 240mm, a 5mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅70.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 18.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 47.8 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 855 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 255 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 255 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 90.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) with 80 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 22,651+90% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4352+70% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+145% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2535 MHz+44% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 80 | 136+70% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 4.3 MB+72% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 34+70% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 136+70% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 28.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 288 GB/s+29% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 20.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-19% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-18% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 235mm | 240mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 141.6+55% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 37.6% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 18.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-38% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8 | 56.8+19% |
| Codename | GA106 | AD106 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #224 | #59 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













