
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
2022Why buy it
- ✅13.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅40% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 240).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌150.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ❌57.9% higher power demand at 450W vs 285W.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 168.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 285W instead of 450W, a 165W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
2022GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅13.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅40% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 240).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 168.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 285W instead of 450W, a 165W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌150.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ❌57.9% higher power demand at 450W vs 285W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3090 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 745 FPS | 664 FPS |
| medium | 608 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 571 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 159 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 929 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 760 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 677 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 586 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 719 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 589 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 438 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 878 FPS | 879 FPS |
| medium | 807 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 710 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 600 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 700 FPS | 706 FPS |
| medium | 640 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 560 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 466 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 417 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 331 FPS | 324 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3090 Ti and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,395 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti scores 29,395 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 7.4%. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 40 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1860 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) with 336 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,395 | 31,578+7% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 10752+40% | 7680 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1860 MHz | 2610 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 112+40% | 80 |
| TMUs | 336+40% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 10.5 MB+40% | 7.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84+40% | 60 |
| Tensor Cores | 336+40% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+100% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1008 GB/s+100% | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti draws 450W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 44.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 336mm vs 285mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 450W | 285W-37% |
| Recommended PSU | 850W | 700W-18% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 336mm | 285mm |
| Height | 140mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 65.3 | 110.8+70% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti launched at $1999 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 60% less ($1200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.7 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 168.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $799-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.7 | 39.5+169% |
| Codename | GA102 | AD104 |
| Release | January 27 2022 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #19 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












