
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
2022Why buy it
- ✅64.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅250% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 96).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌568.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌291.3% higher power demand at 450W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 344.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 450W, a 335W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
2022GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅64.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅250% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 96).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 344.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 450W, a 335W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌568.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌291.3% higher power demand at 450W vs 115W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3090 Ti better than GeForce RTX 4060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 55 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 745 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 608 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 571 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 63 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 929 FPS | 812 FPS |
| medium | 760 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 677 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 586 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 719 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 589 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 438 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 186 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 878 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 807 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 710 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 700 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 640 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 560 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 466 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 417 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 331 FPS | 220 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3090 Ti and GeForce RTX 4060

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,395 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti scores 29,395 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti leads by 50.4%. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 40 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 1860 MHz vs 2460 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 24 (GeForce RTX 4060) with 336 Tensor cores vs 96.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,395+50% | 19,548 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10752+250% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40 TFLOPS+165% | 15.11 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1860 MHz | 2460 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 112+133% | 48 |
| TMUs | 336+250% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 10.5 MB+250% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 24 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84+250% | 24 |
| Tensor Cores | 336+250% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 270.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+200% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1008 GB/s+271% | 272 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 24 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti draws 450W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 118.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 336mm vs 240mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 73°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 450W | 115W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 850W | 550W-35% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 336mm | 240mm |
| Height | 140mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 73°C-14% |
| Perf/Watt | 65.3 | 170.0+160% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti launched at $1999 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 85% less ($1700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.7 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 344.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $299-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.7 | 65.4+345% |
| Codename | GA102 | AD107 |
| Release | January 27 2022 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #19 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












