
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,050 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 135.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 22.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 350W, a 275W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 285mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3080 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
2021Why buy it
- ✅199.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌704.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 75W.
- ❌24.5% longer card at 285mm vs 229mm.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,050 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 135.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 22.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 350W, a 275W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 285mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅199.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3080 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌704.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 75W.
- ❌24.5% longer card at 285mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3080 Ti better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 56 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 636 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 316 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 133 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 903 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 739 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 710 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 581 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 434 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 348 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 289 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 821 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 763 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 673 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 604 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 656 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 532 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 453 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 302 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 10240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,861 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti's 26,861 — the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti leads by 241.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10,240 (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 34.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 26,861+241% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 10240+1043% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 34.1 TFLOPS+1043% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 112+250% |
| TMUs | 56 | 320+471% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 10 MB+1036% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 912 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti) — a 612.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 912 GB/s+613% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti's 350W — a 129.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-79% | 350W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-60% | 750W |
| Power Connector | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 285mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+37% | 76.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti launched at $1199. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 87.6% less ($1050 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 22.4 (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 135.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-88% | $1199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+136% | 22.4 |
| Codename | TU117 | GA102 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | May 31 2021 |
| Ranking | #323 | #33 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













