
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 96.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 175W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 2070
2018Why buy it
- ✅98.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌302% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 175W vs 75W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019GeForce RTX 2070
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 96.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 175W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅98.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌302% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 175W vs 75W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2070 better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1650 make more sense than GeForce RTX 2070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 42 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 64 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 723 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 362 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 542 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 362 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 271 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 362 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 289 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 241 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 181 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 361 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 124 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 2070

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 2070
GeForce RTX 2070
The GeForce RTX 2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 17 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,068 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 2070's 16,068 — the GeForce RTX 2070 leads by 104.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2070 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7.465 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1620 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 16,068+104% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2304+157% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 7.465 TFLOPS+150% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+3% | 1620 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 144+157% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 2.3 MB+161% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2070 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 2070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070) — a 250% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2070. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070) — the GeForce RTX 2070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 448 GB/s+250% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2070). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 6.0 (GeForce RTX 2070). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 2070's 175W — a 80% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 2070). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-57% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-45% | 550W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+14% | 91.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 2070 launched at $599. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 75.1% less ($450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 26.8 (GeForce RTX 2070) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 97% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-75% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+97% | 26.8 |
| Codename | TU117 | TU106 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | October 17 2018 |
| Ranking | #323 | #129 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













