
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 41.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 175W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 16,477).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅+109.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌167.8% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 41.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 175W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 41.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 175W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+109.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 16,477).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌167.8% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 41.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 175W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 741 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 593 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 445 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 371 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 278 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 185 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 401 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 130 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
The GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 9 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,477 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER's 16,477 — the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER leads by 109.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,176 (GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7.181 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 16,477+109% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2176+143% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 7.181 TFLOPS+141% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 136+143% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 2.1 MB+139% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER) — a 250% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 448 GB/s+250% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8 (GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER's 175W — a 80% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-57% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-45% | 550W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+11% | 94.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER launched at $399. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 62.7% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 41.3 (GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 27.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-63% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+28% | 41.3 |
| Codename | TU117 | TU106 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | July 9 2019 |
| Ranking | #323 | #121 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













