
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $321 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $470 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 55.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 33.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $470 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 184W, a 109W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 15,935).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅+102.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌215.4% HIGHER MSRP$470 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.9 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($470 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌145.3% higher power demand at 184W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $321 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $470 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 55.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 33.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $470 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 184W, a 109W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+102.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 15,935).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌215.4% HIGHER MSRP$470 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.9 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($470 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌145.3% higher power demand at 184W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 12GB better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 59 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 717 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 478 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 359 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 538 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 179 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 129 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 2060 12GB

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
The GeForce RTX 2060 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 184W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,935 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 2060 12GB's 15,935 — the GeForce RTX 2060 12GB leads by 102.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2060 12GB uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,176 (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7.181 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 15,935+103% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2176+143% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 7.181 TFLOPS+141% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 56 | 136+143% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 2.1 MB+139% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 12GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 12GB has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 12GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB) — a 162.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060 12GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB) — the GeForce RTX 2060 12GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 336 GB/s+163% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 6.0 (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 2060 12GB's 184W — a 84.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 88°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-59% | 184W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-45% | 550W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-20% | 88°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+21% | 86.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 2060 12GB launched at $470. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 68.3% less ($321 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 33.9 (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 55.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 12GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-68% | $470 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+56% | 33.9 |
| Codename | TU117 | TU106 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | December 7 2021 |
| Ranking | #323 | #133 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













