G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1233.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.2 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

GRID P6-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
1242.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 26.2 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

GRID P6-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1233.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.2 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
1242.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 26.2 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is GRID P6-2Q better than GeForce GTX 750 Ti?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,900 vs 3,926 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GRID P6-2Q is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GRID P6-2Q is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GRID P6-2Q is about 1242.3% more expensive on MSRP at $2,000 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 0.7% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 750 Ti really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does GeForce GTX 750 Ti make more sense than GRID P6-2Q?

Yes. GeForce GTX 750 Ti is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (75W vs 225W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $149 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GRID P6-2Q. The trade-off is that GRID P6-2Q currently gives you 0.7% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 750 Ti still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti Benchmark Check

GRID P6-2Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GRID P6-2Q
1080p
low	33 FPS	103 FPS
medium	21 FPS	85 FPS
high	13 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	6 FPS	40 FPS
1440p
low	16 FPS	86 FPS
medium	9 FPS	72 FPS
high	4 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	2 FPS	29 FPS
4K
low	5 FPS	28 FPS
medium	3 FPS	26 FPS
high	2 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	1 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open GRID P6-2Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GRID P6-2Q
1080p
low	80 FPS	128 FPS
medium	49 FPS	101 FPS
high	36 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	21 FPS	63 FPS
1440p
low	37 FPS	88 FPS
medium	27 FPS	65 FPS
high	17 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	40 FPS
4K
low	12 FPS	41 FPS
medium	9 FPS	32 FPS
high	8 FPS	29 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	24 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open GRID P6-2Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GRID P6-2Q
1080p
low	176 FPS	177 FPS
medium	140 FPS	141 FPS
high	117 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	88 FPS
1440p
low	132 FPS	133 FPS
medium	105 FPS	106 FPS
high	88 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	66 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	88 FPS
medium	70 FPS	71 FPS
high	58 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	44 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open GRID P6-2Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GRID P6-2Q
1080p
low	139 FPS	177 FPS
medium	112 FPS	141 FPS
high	97 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	88 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	131 FPS
medium	86 FPS	106 FPS
high	74 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	64 FPS	66 FPS
4K
low	60 FPS	77 FPS
medium	47 FPS	60 FPS
high	36 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	36 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open GRID P6-2Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GRID P6-2Q

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

GRID P6-2Q

The GRID P6-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,926 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 3,900 and the GRID P6-2Q reaches 3,926 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell while the GRID P6-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 2,048 (GRID P6-2Q). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P6-2Q). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GRID P6-2Q
G3D Mark Score	3,900	3,926
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	2048+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.389 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+247%
Boost Clock	1085 MHz	1178 MHz+9%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	40	128+220%
L1 Cache	320 KB	768 KB+140%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID P6-2Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GRID P6-2Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P6-2Q has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GRID P6-2Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (GRID P6-2Q). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GRID P6-2Q
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs NVENC 4 (GRID P6-2Q). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs NVDEC 3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs H.264,H.265 (GRID P6-2Q).

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GRID P6-2Q
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	NVENC 4
Decoder	PureVideo HD	NVDEC 3
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti draws 75W versus the GRID P6-2Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 350W (GRID P6-2Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GRID P6-2Q
TDP	75W-67%	225W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	145mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	65	—
Perf/Watt	52.0+199%	17.4

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti launched at $149 MSRP, while the GRID P6-2Q launched at $2000. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti costs 92.5% less ($1851 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.2 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 2.0 (GRID P6-2Q) — the GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers 1210% better value. The GRID P6-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).