GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition better than GeForce GTX 750 Ti?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,900 vs 3,927 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013 and more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 0.7% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 750 Ti really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does GeForce GTX 750 Ti make more sense than GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition?

Yes. GeForce GTX 750 Ti is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 100W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $149 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition currently gives you 0.7% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 750 Ti still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
1080p
low	33 FPS	102 FPS
medium	21 FPS	83 FPS
high	13 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	6 FPS	38 FPS
1440p
low	16 FPS	85 FPS
medium	9 FPS	71 FPS
high	4 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	2 FPS	28 FPS
4K
low	5 FPS	28 FPS
medium	3 FPS	26 FPS
high	2 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	1 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
1080p
low	80 FPS	83 FPS
medium	49 FPS	59 FPS
high	36 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	21 FPS	28 FPS
1440p
low	37 FPS	46 FPS
medium	27 FPS	30 FPS
high	17 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	15 FPS
4K
low	12 FPS	17 FPS
medium	9 FPS	11 FPS
high	8 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	6 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
1080p
low	176 FPS	177 FPS
medium	140 FPS	141 FPS
high	117 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	88 FPS
1440p
low	132 FPS	133 FPS
medium	105 FPS	106 FPS
high	88 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	66 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	88 FPS
medium	70 FPS	71 FPS
high	58 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	44 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
1080p
low	139 FPS	126 FPS
medium	112 FPS	100 FPS
high	97 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	69 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	96 FPS
medium	86 FPS	78 FPS
high	74 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	64 FPS	50 FPS
4K
low	60 FPS	56 FPS
medium	47 FPS	43 FPS
high	36 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	23 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 797 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,927 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 3,900 and the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition reaches 3,927 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 2.142 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition).

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
G3D Mark Score	3,900	3,927
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	1344+110%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.389 TFLOPS	2.142 TFLOPS+54%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	112+180%
L1 Cache	320 KB+186%	112 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition) — a 85.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition) — the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	160 GB/s+85%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.