
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 780M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 780M SLI
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
2014GeForce GTX 780M SLI
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 750 Ti better than GeForce GTX 780M SLI?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 780M SLI still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 780M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 16 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 780M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 780M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 780M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 780M SLI

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GTX 780M SLI
GeForce GTX 780M SLI
The GeForce GTX 780M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,864 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 3,900 and the GeForce GTX 780M SLI reaches 3,864 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 780M SLI uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 3,072 (GeForce GTX 780M SLI).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 780M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,900 | 3,864 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 3072+380% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 780M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 780M SLI has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780M SLI) — a 85.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780M SLI. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 780M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 160 GB/s+85% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 780M SLI's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 780M SLI). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 780M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-63% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 52.0+169% | 19.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 780M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Codename | GM107 | N14E-GTX |
| Release | February 18 2014 | May 30 2013 |
| Ranking | #501 | #340 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












