G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
✅Measures 145mm instead of 229mm, a 84mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,900 vs 14,114).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Why buy it

✅+261.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 54.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 26.2 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
❌57.9% longer card at 229mm vs 145mm.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
✅Measures 145mm instead of 229mm, a 84mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅+261.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 54.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 26.2 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,900 vs 14,114).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
❌57.9% longer card at 229mm vs 145mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than GeForce GTX 750 Ti?

Yes. GeForce RTX 2060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 14,114 vs 3,900 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 2060 is a 2019 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a 2014 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014, 261.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 2060 is about 134.2% more expensive on MSRP at $349 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 261.9% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 750 Ti really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is GeForce GTX 750 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 3,900 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 2060 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 2060
1080p
low	33 FPS	108 FPS
medium	21 FPS	98 FPS
high	13 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	6 FPS	69 FPS
1440p
low	16 FPS	95 FPS
medium	9 FPS	83 FPS
high	4 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	2 FPS	60 FPS
4K
low	5 FPS	47 FPS
medium	3 FPS	43 FPS
high	2 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	1 FPS	27 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open GeForce RTX 2060

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 2060
1080p
low	80 FPS	290 FPS
medium	49 FPS	247 FPS
high	36 FPS	197 FPS
ultra	21 FPS	155 FPS
1440p
low	37 FPS	192 FPS
medium	27 FPS	164 FPS
high	17 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	104 FPS
4K
low	12 FPS	108 FPS
medium	9 FPS	91 FPS
high	8 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	57 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open GeForce RTX 2060

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 2060
1080p
low	176 FPS	635 FPS
medium	140 FPS	508 FPS
high	117 FPS	423 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	318 FPS
1440p
low	132 FPS	476 FPS
medium	105 FPS	381 FPS
high	88 FPS	318 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	238 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	318 FPS
medium	70 FPS	254 FPS
high	58 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	159 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open GeForce RTX 2060

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 2060
1080p
low	163 FPS	428 FPS
medium	132 FPS	354 FPS
high	117 FPS	286 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	244 FPS
1440p
low	114 FPS	357 FPS
medium	96 FPS	302 FPS
high	86 FPS	235 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	193 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	204 FPS
medium	54 FPS	166 FPS
high	44 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	119 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open GeForce RTX 2060

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 3,900 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 261.9%. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1680 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 2060
G3D Mark Score	3,900	14,114+262%
Architecture	Maxwell	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	640	1920+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.389 TFLOPS	6.451 TFLOPS+364%
Boost Clock	1085 MHz	1680 MHz+55%
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	40	120+200%
L1 Cache	0.31 MB	1.9 MB+513%
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 750 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 2060
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) — a 288.9% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 2060
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	6 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	336 GB/s+289%
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 2060
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 2060
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	NVENC (Turing)
Decoder	PureVideo HD	NVDEC (Turing)
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 72.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 72.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 2060
TDP	75W-53%	160W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	8-pin
Length	145mm	229mm
Height	111mm	113mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	65-10%	72
Perf/Watt	52.0	88.2+70%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti costs 57.3% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.2 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 54.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).