Page Index

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014Core: 1020 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz

Popular choices:

••••GTX 1650•••••
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
4 GB 75
3,900
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 745
brand logoGeForce GTX 950A
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 960A
brand logoGeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce GTX 980M SLI
brand logoGeForce RTX 3060 12GB
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB 75
7,869
+101.8%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 960
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅Measures 145mm instead of 229mm, a 84mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,900 vs 7,869).
  • ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅+101.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Delivers 101.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 26.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 750 Ti: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 750 Ti is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • ❌57.9% longer card at 229mm vs 145mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than GeForce GTX 750 Ti?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 3,900 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a 2014 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014, 101.8% more raw performance headroom, and a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That extra performance headroom should help it hold higher settings and newer game demands for longer.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1650 is in basically the same MSRP band at $149 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 101.8% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 750 Ti really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is GeForce GTX 750 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 3,900 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low33 FPS94 FPS
medium21 FPS83 FPS
high13 FPS70 FPS
ultra6 FPS58 FPS
1440p
low16 FPS87 FPS
medium9 FPS74 FPS
high4 FPS60 FPS
ultra2 FPS50 FPS
4K
low5 FPS41 FPS
medium3 FPS39 FPS
high2 FPS27 FPS
ultra1 FPS24 FPS
Open GeForce GTX 750 TiOpen GeForce GTX 1650
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low80 FPS136 FPS
medium49 FPS113 FPS
high36 FPS94 FPS
ultra21 FPS71 FPS
1440p
low37 FPS79 FPS
medium27 FPS62 FPS
high17 FPS44 FPS
ultra11 FPS35 FPS
4K
low12 FPS36 FPS
medium9 FPS27 FPS
high8 FPS21 FPS
ultra5 FPS15 FPS
Open GeForce GTX 750 TiOpen GeForce GTX 1650
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low176 FPS323 FPS
medium140 FPS283 FPS
high117 FPS205 FPS
ultra88 FPS169 FPS
1440p
low132 FPS225 FPS
medium105 FPS202 FPS
high88 FPS151 FPS
ultra66 FPS117 FPS
4K
low88 FPS130 FPS
medium70 FPS117 FPS
high58 FPS79 FPS
ultra44 FPS50 FPS
Open GeForce GTX 750 TiOpen GeForce GTX 1650
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low163 FPS261 FPS
medium132 FPS211 FPS
high117 FPS191 FPS
ultra88 FPS166 FPS
1440p
low114 FPS201 FPS
medium96 FPS158 FPS
high86 FPS135 FPS
ultra66 FPS113 FPS
4K
low67 FPS99 FPS
medium54 FPS74 FPS
high44 FPS65 FPS
ultra34 FPS51 FPS
Open GeForce GTX 750 TiOpen GeForce GTX 1650
Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 3,900 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 101.8%. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
3,900
7,869+102%
Architecture
Maxwell
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
640
896+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.389 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS+115%
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
1665 MHz+53%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
56+40%
L1 Cache
320 KB
896 KB+180%
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 48.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
128 GB/s+48%
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.4+17%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
PureVideo HD
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 145mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
75W
75W
Recommended PSU
300W
300W
Power Connector
None
None
Length
145mm
229mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
65-7%
70°C
Perf/Watt
52.0
104.9+102%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.2 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 101.5% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$149
$149
Performance per Dollar
26.2
52.8+102%
Codename
GM107
TU117
Release
February 18 2014
April 23 2019
Ranking
#501
#323