GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1060

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014Core: 1020 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $100 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
  • Measures 145mm instead of 173mm, a 28mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,900 vs 10,064).
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • +158.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 54.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 26.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 750 Ti: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 750 Ti is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
  • 19.3% longer card at 173mm vs 145mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than GeForce GTX 750 Ti?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,064 vs 3,900 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a 2014 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2016 generation instead of 2014, 158.1% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, and a 16nm process instead of 28nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1060 is about 67.1% more expensive on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 158.1% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 750 Ti really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is GeForce GTX 750 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 3,900 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1060
1080p
low33 FPS117 FPS
medium21 FPS105 FPS
high13 FPS91 FPS
ultra6 FPS77 FPS
1440p
low16 FPS103 FPS
medium9 FPS87 FPS
high4 FPS76 FPS
ultra2 FPS67 FPS
4K
low5 FPS55 FPS
medium3 FPS49 FPS
high2 FPS41 FPS
ultra1 FPS37 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1060
1080p
low80 FPS216 FPS
medium49 FPS181 FPS
high36 FPS148 FPS
ultra21 FPS113 FPS
1440p
low37 FPS134 FPS
medium27 FPS107 FPS
high17 FPS87 FPS
ultra11 FPS68 FPS
4K
low12 FPS62 FPS
medium9 FPS51 FPS
high8 FPS49 FPS
ultra5 FPS41 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1060
1080p
low176 FPS453 FPS
medium140 FPS362 FPS
high117 FPS302 FPS
ultra88 FPS226 FPS
1440p
low132 FPS340 FPS
medium105 FPS272 FPS
high88 FPS226 FPS
ultra66 FPS170 FPS
4K
low88 FPS226 FPS
medium70 FPS181 FPS
high58 FPS151 FPS
ultra44 FPS113 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1060
1080p
low139 FPS358 FPS
medium112 FPS302 FPS
high97 FPS260 FPS
ultra84 FPS226 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS299 FPS
medium86 FPS254 FPS
high74 FPS208 FPS
ultra64 FPS170 FPS
4K
low60 FPS170 FPS
medium47 FPS133 FPS
high36 FPS123 FPS
ultra29 FPS102 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 1060

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 3,900 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 158.1%. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1733 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score
3,900
10,064+158%
Architecture
Maxwell
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
640
2560+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.389 TFLOPS
8.873 TFLOPS+539%
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
1733 MHz+60%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
40
160+300%
L1 Cache
320 KB
960 KB+200%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 122.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
6 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
192 GB/s+122%
Bus Width
128-bit
192-bit+50%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1060
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1060
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
PureVideo HD
NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 82.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: None vs 6-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1060
TDP
75W-58%
180W
Recommended PSU
300W-25%
400W
Power Connector
None
6-pin
Length
145mm
173mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
65
Perf/Watt
52.0
55.9+7%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti costs 40.2% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.2 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 54.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1060
MSRP
$149-40%
$249
Performance per Dollar
26.2
40.4+54%
Codename
GM107
GP104
Release
February 18 2014
May 27 2016
Ranking
#501
#137