GeForce GTX 680 vs RTX A400

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

RTX A400

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

5609

G3D Mark Score

5983

Performance Difference

RTX A400 is 6.7% faster than GeForce GTX 680

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

GeForce GTX 6804096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
19%
low70%
medium30%
high14%
ultra4%
1440pLow
10%
low42%
medium14%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
5%
low14%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 5,609 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

RTX A400N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, RTX A400 performs 6.7% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between GeForce GTX 680 and RTX A400.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for GeForce GTX 680 and RTX A400

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680

The GeForce GTX 680 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $499.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:128
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:128 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:1006 MHz
Boost Clock:1058 MHz
Shading Units:1536
Transistor Count:3,540 million
Texture Fill Rate:135.4
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):195 Watt
Floating Point Performance:3.25 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK104
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$499
Release Date:March 22 2012
Performance Ranking Position:410
NVIDIA

RTX A400

The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It includes 6 ray tracing cores. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:24
Vram:null
Core Clock:727 MHz
Boost Clock:1762 MHz
Tensor Cores:24
Shading Units:768
Transistor Count:8,700 million
Ray Tracing Cores:6
Texture Fill Rate:42.29
Manufacturing Process:8 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):50 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.706 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GA107
Architecture:Ampere (2020βˆ’2025)
Release Date:April 16 2024
Performance Ranking Position:397

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 680 and RTX A400