
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX A400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅401.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 14.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
RTX A400
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $264 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.3 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020RTX A400
2024Why buy it
- ✅401.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 14.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $264 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.3 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than RTX A400?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A400 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and RTX A400

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX A400
RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the RTX A400's 5,983 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 239.5%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1762 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6 (RTX A400) with 152 Tensor cores vs 24.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+239% | 5,983 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+533% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+499% | 2.706 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1762 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 80+400% | 16 |
| TMUs | 152+533% | 24 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 38+533% | 6 |
| Tensor Cores | 152+533% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A400 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A400 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 120% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 50W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 119.7+18% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the RTX A400 launched at $135. The RTX A400 costs 66.2% less ($264 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 44.3 (RTX A400) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 14.9% better value. The RTX A400 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $135-66% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+15% | 44.3 |
| Codename | GA104 | GA107 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #73 | #397 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












