
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1660
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 120W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 11,639).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce GTX 1660
2019Why buy it
- ✅+47.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 120W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019GeForce GTX 1660
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 120W, a 45W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+47.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 11,639).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 120W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1660 better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1650 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1660?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 131 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 328 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 233 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 88 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 1660

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660
The GeForce GTX 1660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 14 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,639 points. Launch price was $219.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce GTX 1660's 11,639 — the GeForce GTX 1660 leads by 47.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1660 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1785 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 11,639+48% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1408+57% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 5.027 TFLOPS+68% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1785 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 56 | 88+57% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 1.4 MB+59% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1660 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660) — the GeForce GTX 1660 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 192 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1660's 120W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 1660). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-38% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-33% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+8% | 97.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1660 launched at $219. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 32% less ($70 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 53.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) — the GeForce GTX 1660 offers 0.6% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-32% | $219 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8 | 53.1 |
| Codename | TU117 | TU116 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | March 14 2019 |
| Ranking | #323 | #231 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













