
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $179 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 170W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,525 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+125.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌240% higher power demand at 170W vs 50W.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
2012GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $179 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 170W, a 120W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+125.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,525 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌240% higher power demand at 170W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 32 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 18 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 254 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 176 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 186 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,525 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti scores 7,525 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 125.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,525 | 16,995+126% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 3584+367% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.425 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+794% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 64 | 112+75% |
| L1 Cache | 0.06 MB | 3.5 MB+5733% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) — a 87.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 360 GB/s+88% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6 (Volta) | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4 | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 109.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-71% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 550W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 150.5+51% | 100.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti launched at $150 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti costs 54.4% less ($179 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.2 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-54% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.2 | 51.7+3% |
| Codename | GK106 | GA106 |
| Release | October 9 2012 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #633 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












