
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅129.0% more average FPS across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 250mm, a 8mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2016GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅129.0% more average FPS across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 250mm, a 8mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than GeForce GTX 1060 3GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 3GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 859 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 602 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 221 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 580 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 478 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 290 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 195 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 3GB and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1708 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,815 points. Launch price was $199.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB scores 9,815 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 106.9%. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 3.935 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1708 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,815 | 20,312+107% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152 | 4864+322% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.935 TFLOPS | 16.2 TFLOPS+312% |
| Boost Clock | 1708 MHz+3% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 80+67% |
| TMUs | 72 | 152+111% |
| L1 Cache | 0.42 MB | 4.8 MB+1043% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — a 133.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 8 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 448 GB/s+133% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB draws 120W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 250mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-40% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-33% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 250mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 81.8 | 101.6+24% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB launched at $199 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB costs 50.1% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 49.3 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 3.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-50% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.3 | 50.9+3% |
| Codename | GP106 | GA104 |
| Release | August 18 2016 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #272 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













