
GeForce GT 640
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7750M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GT 640
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
Radeon HD 7750M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
GeForce GT 640
2012Radeon HD 7750M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 7750M better than GeForce GT 640?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GT 640 make more sense than Radeon HD 7750M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GT 640 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 16 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GT 640 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GT 640 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GT 640 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 3 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 640 and Radeon HD 7750M

GeForce GT 640
GeForce GT 640
The GeForce GT 640 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points. Launch price was $99.

Radeon HD 7750M
Radeon HD 7750M
The Radeon HD 7750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,191 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 640 scores 1,169 and the Radeon HD 7750M reaches 1,191 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 640 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7750M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640) vs 512 (Radeon HD 7750M). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,169 | 1,191+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6927 TFLOPS+18% | 0.5888 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 128 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 640 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 7750M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 640 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7750M has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 640 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 640) vs 12 (Radeon HD 7750M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12+9% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 640) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7750M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 640) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon HD 7750M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 640 draws 65W versus the Radeon HD 7750M's 28W — a 79.6% difference. The Radeon HD 7750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 640) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7750M). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 28W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-20% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 18.0 | 42.5+136% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













