G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GT 640

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 75W, a 10W reduction.
✅Measures 145mm instead of 229mm, a 84mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅591.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 347.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GT 640: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GT 640 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌15.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 65W.
❌57.9% longer card at 229mm vs 145mm.

GeForce GT 640

2012

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 75W, a 10W reduction.
✅Measures 145mm instead of 229mm, a 84mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅591.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 347.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GT 640: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GT 640 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌15.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 65W.
❌57.9% longer card at 229mm vs 145mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than GeForce GT 640?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce GTX 1650 averages 591.1% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 1,169 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce GT 640 is a 2012 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2012, 573.1% more raw performance headroom, and a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That extra performance headroom should help it hold higher settings and newer game demands for longer.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1650 is about 50.5% more expensive on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and you are getting 591.1% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 573.1% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GT 640 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is GeForce GT 640 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. GeForce GT 640 is 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 1,169 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 640 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GT 640	GeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low	13 FPS	94 FPS
medium	9 FPS	83 FPS
high	5 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	3 FPS	58 FPS
1440p
low	9 FPS	87 FPS
medium	5 FPS	74 FPS
high	2 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	1 FPS	50 FPS
4K
low	4 FPS	41 FPS
medium	2 FPS	39 FPS
high	1 FPS	27 FPS
ultra	1 FPS	24 FPS

Open GeForce GT 640 Open GeForce GTX 1650

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GT 640	GeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low	34 FPS	136 FPS
medium	15 FPS	113 FPS
high	11 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	7 FPS	71 FPS
1440p
low	11 FPS	79 FPS
medium	5 FPS	62 FPS
high	4 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	3 FPS	35 FPS
4K
low	4 FPS	36 FPS
medium	2 FPS	27 FPS
high	1 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	1 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce GT 640 Open GeForce GTX 1650

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GT 640	GeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low	53 FPS	323 FPS
medium	42 FPS	283 FPS
high	35 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	169 FPS
1440p
low	39 FPS	225 FPS
medium	32 FPS	202 FPS
high	26 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	20 FPS	117 FPS
4K
low	26 FPS	130 FPS
medium	21 FPS	117 FPS
high	18 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	13 FPS	50 FPS

Open GeForce GT 640 Open GeForce GTX 1650

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GT 640	GeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low	53 FPS	261 FPS
medium	42 FPS	211 FPS
high	26 FPS	191 FPS
ultra	16 FPS	166 FPS
1440p
low	6 FPS	201 FPS
medium	4 FPS	158 FPS
high	3 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	2 FPS	113 FPS
4K
low	4 FPS	99 FPS
medium	2 FPS	74 FPS
high	2 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	1 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce GT 640 Open GeForce GTX 1650

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 640 and GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce GT 640

The GeForce GT 640 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points. Launch price was $99.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 640 scores 1,169 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 573.1%. The GeForce GT 640 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce GT 640	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	1,169	7,869+573%
Architecture	Kepler	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	384	896+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6927 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS+331%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	56+75%
L1 Cache	32 KB	896 KB+2700%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 640	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 640) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 640	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 640) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GT 640	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	11.0	12+9%
Vulkan	1.1	1.4+27%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 640) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 640) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce GT 640	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	NVENC 1.0	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 640 draws 65W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 14.3% difference. The GeForce GT 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 640) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 145mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 640	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	65W-13%	75W
Recommended PSU	300W	300W
Power Connector	None	None
Length	145mm	229mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	60°C-14%	70°C
Perf/Watt	18.0	104.9+483%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 640 launched at $99 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. The GeForce GT 640 costs 33.6% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.8 (GeForce GT 640) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 347.5% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).