
GeForce GT 640
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GT 640
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 173mm, a 28mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅1013.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 242.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GT 640: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GT 640 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
- ❌19.3% longer card at 173mm vs 145mm.
GeForce GT 640
2012GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 173mm, a 28mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅1013.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 242.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GT 640: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GT 640 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
- ❌19.3% longer card at 173mm vs 145mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than GeForce GT 640?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GT 640 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GT 640 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GT 640 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GT 640 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 453 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 113 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GT 640 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 102 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 640 and GeForce GTX 1060

GeForce GT 640
GeForce GT 640
The GeForce GT 640 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points. Launch price was $99.

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 640 scores 1,169 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 760.9%. The GeForce GT 640 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,169 | 10,064+761% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2560+567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6927 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+1181% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 160+400% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 960 KB+2900% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 640 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 640) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 640) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12+9% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 640) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 640) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1.0 | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 640 draws 65W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 93.9% difference. The GeForce GT 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 640) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: None vs 6-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-64% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-25% | 400W |
| Power Connector | None | 6-pin |
| Length | 145mm | 173mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 18.0 | 55.9+211% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 640 launched at $99 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249. The GeForce GT 640 costs 60.2% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.8 (GeForce GT 640) vs 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 242.4% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-60% | $249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.8 | 40.4+242% |
| Codename | GK107 | GP104 |
| Release | June 5 2012 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #837 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













