
FX-6120
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
FX-6120
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $111 less on MSRP ($188 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,853 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.5 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($188 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +239.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Delivers 256.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $188 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌59% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$188 MSRP
FX-6120
2012Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $111 less on MSRP ($188 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +239.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Delivers 256.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $188 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,853 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.5 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($188 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌59% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$188 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than FX-6120?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FX-6120 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FX-6120 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FX-6120 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FX-6120 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-6120 and Ryzen 5 5600X

FX-6120
FX-6120
The FX-6120 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,853 points. Launch price was $69.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The FX-6120 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, matching the Ryzen 5 5600X's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-6120 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 9.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The FX-6120 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6120 scores 3,853 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 140% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-6120 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | FX-6120 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.6 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 32 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+1100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 3,853 | 21,845+467% |
Memory & Platform
The FX-6120 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-6120 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (FX-6120) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | FX-6120 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The FX-6120 launched at $188 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($188 vs $299), the FX-6120 is $111 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-6120 delivers 20.5 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 112.4% better value option.
| Feature | FX-6120 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $188-37% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.5 | 73.1+257% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












