FX-6120 vs Xeon E3-1220

AMD

FX-6120

6 Cores6 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2012

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon E3-1220

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2011

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

FX-6120

2012

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (3,853 vs 3,859).
    • Launch MSRP is still $188 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • 18.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 80W.

    Xeon E3-1220

    2011

    Why buy it

    • +0.2% higher PassMark.
    • Draws 80W instead of 95W, a 15W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is FX-6120 better than Xeon E3-1220?
    Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E3-1220 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-6120 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1220 is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    FX-6120 is the smarter buy today. FX-6120 is at an unclear MSRP at $188 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon E3-1220 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    FX-6120 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetFX-6120Xeon E3-1220
    1080p
    low96 FPS96 FPS
    medium96 FPS96 FPS
    high96 FPS96 FPS
    ultra96 FPS85 FPS
    1440p
    low96 FPS96 FPS
    medium96 FPS96 FPS
    high94 FPS87 FPS
    ultra78 FPS70 FPS
    4K
    low65 FPS62 FPS
    medium57 FPS56 FPS
    high45 FPS43 FPS
    ultra36 FPS34 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetFX-6120Xeon E3-1220
    1080p
    low96 FPS96 FPS
    medium96 FPS96 FPS
    high96 FPS96 FPS
    ultra96 FPS96 FPS
    1440p
    low96 FPS96 FPS
    medium96 FPS96 FPS
    high96 FPS96 FPS
    ultra96 FPS88 FPS
    4K
    low96 FPS96 FPS
    medium96 FPS92 FPS
    high96 FPS71 FPS
    ultra96 FPS51 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetFX-6120Xeon E3-1220
    1080p
    low96 FPS96 FPS
    medium96 FPS96 FPS
    high96 FPS96 FPS
    ultra96 FPS96 FPS
    1440p
    low96 FPS96 FPS
    medium96 FPS96 FPS
    high96 FPS96 FPS
    ultra96 FPS96 FPS
    4K
    low96 FPS96 FPS
    medium96 FPS96 FPS
    high96 FPS96 FPS
    ultra96 FPS96 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetFX-6120Xeon E3-1220
    1080p
    low96 FPS96 FPS
    medium96 FPS96 FPS
    high96 FPS96 FPS
    ultra96 FPS96 FPS
    1440p
    low96 FPS96 FPS
    medium96 FPS96 FPS
    high96 FPS96 FPS
    ultra96 FPS96 FPS
    4K
    low96 FPS96 FPS
    medium96 FPS96 FPS
    high96 FPS96 FPS
    ultra96 FPS96 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of FX-6120 and Xeon E3-1220

    AMD

    FX-6120

    The FX-6120 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,853 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Xeon E3-1220

    The Xeon E3-1220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,859 points. Launch price was $395.

    Processing Power

    The FX-6120 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon E3-1220 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-6120 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-6120 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1220 — a 21.1% clock advantage for the FX-6120 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The FX-6120 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1220 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6120 scores 3,853 against the Xeon E3-1220's 3,859 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E3-1220. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

    FeatureFX-6120Xeon E3-1220
    Cores / Threads
    6 / 6+50%
    4 / 4
    Boost Clock
    4.2 GHz+24%
    3.4 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.6 GHz+16%
    3.1 GHz
    L3 Cache
    8 MB (total)
    8 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    6 MB+2300%
    256 kB (per core)
    Process
    32 nm
    32 nm
    Architecture
    Zambezi (2011−2012)
    Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
    PassMark
    3,853
    3,859
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The FX-6120 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1220 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureFX-6120Xeon E3-1220
    Socket
    AM3+
    LGA1155
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 2.0