
FX-6120
Popular choices:

Pentium Gold G5600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
FX-6120
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $188 MSRP, while Pentium Gold G5600 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌75.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 54W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium Gold G5600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Pentium Gold G5600
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 54W instead of 95W, a 41W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 630, while FX-6120 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-6120 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,844 vs 3,853).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
FX-6120
2012Pentium Gold G5600
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 54W instead of 95W, a 41W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 630, while FX-6120 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $188 MSRP, while Pentium Gold G5600 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌75.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 54W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium Gold G5600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-6120 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,844 vs 3,853).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is FX-6120 better than Pentium Gold G5600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FX-6120 | Pentium Gold G5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FX-6120 | Pentium Gold G5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 45 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FX-6120 | Pentium Gold G5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FX-6120 | Pentium Gold G5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-6120 and Pentium Gold G5600

FX-6120
FX-6120
The FX-6120 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,853 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium Gold G5600
Pentium Gold G5600
The Pentium Gold G5600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,844 points. Launch price was $93.
Processing Power
The FX-6120 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Pentium Gold G5600 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-6120 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-6120 versus 3.9 GHz on the Pentium Gold G5600 — a 7.4% clock advantage for the FX-6120 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The FX-6120 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium Gold G5600 uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6120 scores 3,853 against the Pentium Gold G5600's 3,844 — a 0.2% lead for the FX-6120. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-6120 vs 4 MB (total) on the Pentium Gold G5600.
| Feature | FX-6120 | Pentium Gold G5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6+200% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+8% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.9 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+100% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+2300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 3,853 | 3,844 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 2,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 837 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-6120 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Gold G5600 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-6120 | Pentium Gold G5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4 2400 MHz |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (FX-6120) / true (Pentium Gold G5600). The Pentium Gold G5600 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the FX-6120 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium Gold G5600 targets Desktop.
| Feature | FX-6120 | Pentium Gold G5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













