FirePro S7000 vs Radeon Pro 465

FirePro S7000

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 465

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

4524

G3D Mark Score

4538

Performance Difference

Radeon Pro 465 is 0.3% faster than FirePro S7000

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

FirePro S70004096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
13%
low60%
medium20%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
7%
low30%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 4,524 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Radeon Pro 465N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon Pro 465 performs 0.3% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 465.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 465

FirePro S7000

The FirePro S7000 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Core clock: 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,524 points. Launch price was $1,249.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:80
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:320 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:950 MHz
Shading Units:1280
Transistor Count:2,800 million
Texture Fill Rate:76.00
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):350 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.432 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Pitcairn
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$1,249
Release Date:August 27 2012
Performance Ranking Position:462
AMD

Radeon Pro 465

The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:64
Vram:null
L1 Cache:256 kB
L2 Cache:1024 kB
Core Clock:850 MHz
Boost Clock:907 MHz
Shading Units:1024
Transistor Count:3,000 million
Texture Fill Rate:58.05
Manufacturing Process:14 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):35 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.858 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Baffin
Architecture:GCN 4.0 (2016βˆ’2020)
Release Date:October 30 2016
Performance Ranking Position:547

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 465