FirePro S7000 vs Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280

FirePro S7000

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

4524

G3D Mark Score

4765

Performance Difference

Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 is 5.3% faster than FirePro S7000

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

FirePro S70004096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
13%
low60%
medium20%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
7%
low30%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 4,524 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Radeon HD 7950 / R9 2803072 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
10%
low42%
medium14%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
6%
low24%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

3 GB VRAM Β· 4,765 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 performs 5.3% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280

FirePro S7000

The FirePro S7000 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Core clock: 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,524 points. Launch price was $1,249.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:80
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:320 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:950 MHz
Shading Units:1280
Transistor Count:2,800 million
Texture Fill Rate:76.00
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):350 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.432 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Pitcairn
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$1,249
Release Date:August 27 2012
Performance Ranking Position:462
AMD

Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280

The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Boost clock: 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,765 points. Launch price was $449.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:112
Vram:3072 MB
L1 Cache:448 kB
L2 Cache:768 kB
Boost Clock:1250 MHz
Shading Units:1792
Transistor Count:4,313 million
Texture Fill Rate:89.60
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):200 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.867 TFLOPS
Quantidade De Transportadores Compute:28

General Information

Design:reference
Codename:Tahiti
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$449
Release Date:January 31 2012
Performance Ranking Position:454

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280