PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9655

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.8% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 320 MB).
✅Costs $1,712 less on MSRP ($11,852 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
✅Delivers 16.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.2 vs 11.3 PassMark/$ ($11,852 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

EPYC 9845

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 390W instead of 400W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9655 across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (152,985 vs 156,110).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (320 MB vs 384 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.3 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($13,564 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).

EPYC 9655

2024

EPYC 9845

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.8% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 320 MB).
✅Costs $1,712 less on MSRP ($11,852 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
✅Delivers 16.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.2 vs 11.3 PassMark/$ ($11,852 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅Draws 390W instead of 400W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9655 across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (152,985 vs 156,110).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (320 MB vs 384 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.3 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($13,564 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9655 better than EPYC 9845?

Yes. EPYC 9655 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 12.8% average FPS lead across 8 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9655 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 12.8% more average FPS across 8 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9655 is the better fit. You are getting 2% better PassMark, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 320 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9655 is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9655 is $1,712 cheaper on MSRP at $11,852 MSRP versus $13,564 MSRP, and it gives you a 12.8% average FPS lead across 8 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 16.8% better value on MSRP (13.2 vs 11.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9655 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 20% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 320 MB), more multi-core headroom with 96 cores / 192 threads instead of 160/320, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9655 Benchmark Check

EPYC 9845 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9655	EPYC 9845
1080p
low	170 FPS	192 FPS
medium	143 FPS	156 FPS
high	122 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	149 FPS	158 FPS
medium	121 FPS	124 FPS
high	99 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	83 FPS	72 FPS
medium	73 FPS	60 FPS
high	57 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	39 FPS

Open EPYC 9655 Open EPYC 9845

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9655	EPYC 9845
1080p
low	696 FPS	274 FPS
medium	602 FPS	241 FPS
high	475 FPS	198 FPS
ultra	411 FPS	163 FPS
1440p
low	566 FPS	225 FPS
medium	501 FPS	202 FPS
high	414 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	336 FPS	137 FPS
4K
low	331 FPS	139 FPS
medium	295 FPS	128 FPS
high	267 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	235 FPS	96 FPS

Open EPYC 9655 Open EPYC 9845

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9655	EPYC 9845
1080p
low	746 FPS	743 FPS
medium	633 FPS	610 FPS
high	589 FPS	556 FPS
ultra	519 FPS	481 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	594 FPS
medium	474 FPS	494 FPS
high	434 FPS	450 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	390 FPS
4K
low	411 FPS	430 FPS
medium	331 FPS	335 FPS
high	299 FPS	298 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	240 FPS

Open EPYC 9655 Open EPYC 9845

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9655	EPYC 9845
1080p
low	1047 FPS	958 FPS
medium	939 FPS	869 FPS
high	821 FPS	746 FPS
ultra	744 FPS	646 FPS
1440p
low	839 FPS	739 FPS
medium	733 FPS	646 FPS
high	641 FPS	552 FPS
ultra	562 FPS	473 FPS
4K
low	605 FPS	530 FPS
medium	539 FPS	474 FPS
high	477 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	416 FPS	358 FPS

Open EPYC 9655 Open EPYC 9845

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9655 and EPYC 9845

EPYC 9655

The EPYC 9655 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 156,110 points. Launch price was $11,852.

EPYC 9845

The EPYC 9845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 160 cores and 320 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 390 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 152,985 points. Launch price was $13,564.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9655 packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the EPYC 9845 offers 160 cores / 320 threads — the EPYC 9845 has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655 versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9845 — a 19.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9655 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9655 scores 156,110 against the EPYC 9845's 152,985 — a 2% lead for the EPYC 9655. L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9655 vs 320 MB (total) on the EPYC 9845.

Feature	EPYC 9655	EPYC 9845
Cores / Threads	96 / 192	160 / 320+67%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+22%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+24%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	384 MB (total)+20%	320 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm	3 nm-25%
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Turin (2024)
PassMark	156,110+2%	152,985
Geekbench 6 Single	2,830	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	29,329	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The EPYC 9655 supports up to 9 TB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9655) and SP5 (EPYC 9845).

Feature	EPYC 9655	EPYC 9845
Socket	SP5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-6000
Max RAM Capacity	9 TB+50%	6 TB
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9655 targets Data Center, EPYC 9845 targets Data Center / AI Training. Direct competitor: EPYC 9655 rivals Xeon 6979P; EPYC 9845 rivals Xeon 6972P.

Feature	EPYC 9655	EPYC 9845
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use	Data Center	Data Center / AI Training

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9655 launched at $11852 MSRP, while the EPYC 9845 debuted at $13564. On MSRP ($11852 vs $13564), the EPYC 9655 is $1712 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9655 delivers 13.2 pts/$ vs 11.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9845 — making the EPYC 9655 the 15.5% better value option.