PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9655

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 192 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($11,852 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌515.4% higher power demand at 400W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $11,553 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
✅Delivers 575.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 400W, a 335W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9655 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,715 vs 29,329).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9655, which brings 96 cores / 192 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9655 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9655

2024

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 192 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $11,553 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
✅Delivers 575.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 400W, a 335W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($11,852 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌515.4% higher power demand at 400W vs 65W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9655 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,715 vs 29,329).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9655, which brings 96 cores / 192 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9655 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9655 better than Ryzen 7 5700X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9655 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9655 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 10.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 384 MB vs 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9655 is the better fit. You are getting 201.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 1100% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9655 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 5700X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9655 is 3863.9% more expensive on MSRP at $11,852 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 5700X is also 575.6% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 13.2 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9655 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 384 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, more multi-core headroom with 96 cores / 192 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9655 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 5700X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9655	Ryzen 7 5700X
1080p
low	170 FPS	156 FPS
medium	143 FPS	129 FPS
high	122 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	149 FPS	137 FPS
medium	121 FPS	111 FPS
high	99 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	83 FPS	77 FPS
medium	73 FPS	67 FPS
high	57 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	43 FPS

Open EPYC 9655 Open Ryzen 7 5700X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9655	Ryzen 7 5700X
1080p
low	696 FPS	649 FPS
medium	602 FPS	549 FPS
high	475 FPS	448 FPS
ultra	411 FPS	404 FPS
1440p
low	566 FPS	552 FPS
medium	501 FPS	484 FPS
high	414 FPS	407 FPS
ultra	336 FPS	350 FPS
4K
low	331 FPS	343 FPS
medium	295 FPS	303 FPS
high	267 FPS	277 FPS
ultra	235 FPS	245 FPS

Open EPYC 9655 Open Ryzen 7 5700X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9655	Ryzen 7 5700X
1080p
low	746 FPS	665 FPS
medium	633 FPS	557 FPS
high	589 FPS	509 FPS
ultra	519 FPS	439 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	554 FPS
medium	474 FPS	458 FPS
high	434 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	358 FPS
4K
low	411 FPS	402 FPS
medium	331 FPS	322 FPS
high	299 FPS	292 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	229 FPS

Open EPYC 9655 Open Ryzen 7 5700X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9655	Ryzen 7 5700X
1080p
low	1047 FPS	665 FPS
medium	939 FPS	665 FPS
high	821 FPS	665 FPS
ultra	744 FPS	665 FPS
1440p
low	839 FPS	665 FPS
medium	733 FPS	665 FPS
high	641 FPS	607 FPS
ultra	562 FPS	533 FPS
4K
low	605 FPS	545 FPS
medium	539 FPS	488 FPS
high	477 FPS	439 FPS
ultra	416 FPS	385 FPS

Open EPYC 9655 Open Ryzen 7 5700X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9655 and Ryzen 7 5700X

EPYC 9655

The EPYC 9655 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 156,110 points. Launch price was $11,852.

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9655 packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9655 has 88 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 9655 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9655 scores 156,110 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 141.7% lead for the EPYC 9655. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,830 vs 2,116, a 28.9% lead for the EPYC 9655 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,329 vs 9,715 (100.5% advantage for the EPYC 9655). L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9655 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.

Feature	EPYC 9655	Ryzen 7 5700X
Cores / Threads	96 / 192+1100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz	4.6 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.4 GHz+31%
L3 Cache	384 MB (total)+1100%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	4 nm-43%	7 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	156,110+487%	26,609
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	14,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,830+34%	2,116
Geekbench 6 Multi	29,329+202%	9,715

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9655 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9655 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X — the EPYC 9655 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 9 TB — 173.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9655) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9655) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) — the EPYC 9655 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9655) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X).

Feature	EPYC 9655	Ryzen 7 5700X
Socket	SP5	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	9 TB+7100%	128 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+433%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9655 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9655) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). Primary use case: EPYC 9655 targets Data Center, Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9655 rivals Xeon 6979P; Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.

Feature	EPYC 9655	Ryzen 7 5700X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V
Target Use	Data Center	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9655 launched at $11852 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5700X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($11852 vs $299), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $11553 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9655 delivers 13.2 pts/$ vs 89.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5700X — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 148.4% better value option.