PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9655

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 192 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($11,852 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌515.4% higher power demand at 400W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $11,523 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
✅Delivers 417.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 400W, a 335W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9655 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 156,110).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9655, which brings 96 cores / 192 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9655 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9655

2024

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 192 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $11,523 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
✅Delivers 417.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 400W, a 335W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($11,852 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌515.4% higher power demand at 400W vs 65W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9655 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 156,110).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9655, which brings 96 cores / 192 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9655 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9655 better than Ryzen 7 3700X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9655 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9655 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 9.8% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 384 MB vs 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9655 is the better fit. You are getting 596% better PassMark, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 1100% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9655 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9655 is 3502.4% more expensive on MSRP at $11,852 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you a 9.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 3700X is also 417.6% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 13.2 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9655 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 384 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, more multi-core headroom with 96 cores / 192 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9655 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9655	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	170 FPS	200 FPS
medium	143 FPS	163 FPS
high	122 FPS	137 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	149 FPS	156 FPS
medium	121 FPS	121 FPS
high	99 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	83 FPS	84 FPS
medium	73 FPS	71 FPS
high	57 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	44 FPS

Open EPYC 9655 Open Ryzen 7 3700X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9655	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	696 FPS	561 FPS
medium	602 FPS	525 FPS
high	475 FPS	428 FPS
ultra	411 FPS	383 FPS
1440p
low	566 FPS	545 FPS
medium	501 FPS	471 FPS
high	414 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	336 FPS	337 FPS
4K
low	331 FPS	350 FPS
medium	295 FPS	304 FPS
high	267 FPS	274 FPS
ultra	235 FPS	242 FPS

Open EPYC 9655 Open Ryzen 7 3700X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9655	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	746 FPS	561 FPS
medium	633 FPS	561 FPS
high	589 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	519 FPS	561 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	561 FPS
medium	474 FPS	561 FPS
high	434 FPS	538 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	470 FPS
4K
low	411 FPS	499 FPS
medium	331 FPS	394 FPS
high	299 FPS	343 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	275 FPS

Open EPYC 9655 Open Ryzen 7 3700X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9655	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	1047 FPS	561 FPS
medium	939 FPS	561 FPS
high	821 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	744 FPS	561 FPS
1440p
low	839 FPS	561 FPS
medium	733 FPS	561 FPS
high	641 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	562 FPS	555 FPS
4K
low	605 FPS	561 FPS
medium	539 FPS	501 FPS
high	477 FPS	447 FPS
ultra	416 FPS	396 FPS

Open EPYC 9655 Open Ryzen 7 3700X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9655 and Ryzen 7 3700X

EPYC 9655

The EPYC 9655 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 156,110 points. Launch price was $11,852.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9655 packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9655 has 88 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 2.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9655 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 9655 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9655 scores 156,110 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 149.7% lead for the EPYC 9655. L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9655 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	EPYC 9655	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	96 / 192+1100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+2%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.6 GHz+38%
L3 Cache	384 MB (total)+1100%	32 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	4 nm-43%	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	156,110+596%	22,430
Geekbench 6 Single	2,830	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	29,329	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9655 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9655 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the EPYC 9655 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 9 TB — 173.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9655) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9655) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the EPYC 9655 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9655) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	EPYC 9655	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	SP5	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	9 TB+7100%	128 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+433%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9655) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Primary use case: EPYC 9655 targets Data Center. Direct competitor: EPYC 9655 rivals Xeon 6979P.

Feature	EPYC 9655	Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	—
Target Use	Data Center	—

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9655 launched at $11852 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($11852 vs $329), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $11523 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9655 delivers 13.2 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 135.2% better value option.