PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9575F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.6% higher average FPS across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $61 less on MSRP ($11,791 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,308 vs 29,329).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

EPYC 9655

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9575F across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌
0.5% HIGHER MSRP
$11,852 MSRPvs$11,791 MSRP

EPYC 9575F

2024

EPYC 9655

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.6% higher average FPS across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $61 less on MSRP ($11,791 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,308 vs 29,329).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9575F across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌
0.5% HIGHER MSRP
$11,852 MSRPvs$11,791 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9655 better than EPYC 9575F?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, EPYC 9575F is ahead with a 12.6% average FPS lead across 15 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9655 pulls ahead with 0.1% better Geekbench multi-core. EPYC 9655 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9655 is the better fit. You are getting 0.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9655 is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9655 is 0.5% more expensive on MSRP at $11,852 MSRP versus $11,791 MSRP, and it gives you 0.1% better Geekbench multi-core. The trade-off is that EPYC 9575F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 12.6% average FPS lead across 15 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 5.1% better value on MSRP (13.2 vs 12.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9655 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB), more multi-core headroom with 96 cores / 192 threads instead of 64/128, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9575F Benchmark Check

EPYC 9655 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9575F	EPYC 9655
1080p
low	303 FPS	170 FPS
medium	280 FPS	143 FPS
high	232 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	99 FPS
1440p
low	268 FPS	149 FPS
medium	223 FPS	121 FPS
high	172 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	186 FPS	83 FPS
medium	154 FPS	73 FPS
high	118 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	47 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open EPYC 9655

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9575F	EPYC 9655
1080p
low	797 FPS	696 FPS
medium	681 FPS	602 FPS
high	536 FPS	475 FPS
ultra	466 FPS	411 FPS
1440p
low	657 FPS	566 FPS
medium	585 FPS	501 FPS
high	475 FPS	414 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	336 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	331 FPS
medium	332 FPS	295 FPS
high	306 FPS	267 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	235 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open EPYC 9655

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9575F	EPYC 9655
1080p
low	884 FPS	746 FPS
medium	721 FPS	633 FPS
high	652 FPS	589 FPS
ultra	553 FPS	519 FPS
1440p
low	689 FPS	561 FPS
medium	560 FPS	474 FPS
high	494 FPS	434 FPS
ultra	417 FPS	376 FPS
4K
low	487 FPS	411 FPS
medium	404 FPS	331 FPS
high	359 FPS	299 FPS
ultra	297 FPS	238 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open EPYC 9655

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9575F	EPYC 9655
1080p
low	1118 FPS	1047 FPS
medium	1007 FPS	939 FPS
high	884 FPS	821 FPS
ultra	797 FPS	744 FPS
1440p
low	884 FPS	839 FPS
medium	778 FPS	733 FPS
high	683 FPS	641 FPS
ultra	595 FPS	562 FPS
4K
low	645 FPS	605 FPS
medium	575 FPS	539 FPS
high	511 FPS	477 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	416 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open EPYC 9655

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9575F and EPYC 9655

EPYC 9575F

The EPYC 9575F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 147,718 points. Launch price was $11,791.

EPYC 9655

The EPYC 9655 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 156,110 points. Launch price was $11,852.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9575F packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9655 offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the EPYC 9655 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9575F versus 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9575F (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9575F scores 147,718 against the EPYC 9655's 156,110 — a 5.5% lead for the EPYC 9655. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,308 vs 29,329 (0.1% advantage for the EPYC 9655). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9575F vs 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9655.

Feature	EPYC 9575F	EPYC 9655
Cores / Threads	64 / 128	96 / 192+50%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+11%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+27%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	384 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm	4 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Turin (2024)
PassMark	147,718	156,110+6%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,830
Geekbench 6 Multi	29,308	29,329

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The EPYC 9655 supports up to 9 TB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9575F) and SP5 (EPYC 9655).

Feature	EPYC 9575F	EPYC 9655
Socket	SP5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-6000
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB	9 TB+50%
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9575F targets Data Center / High Frequency, EPYC 9655 targets Data Center. Direct competitor: EPYC 9575F rivals Xeon 6952P; EPYC 9655 rivals Xeon 6979P.

Feature	EPYC 9575F	EPYC 9655
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use	Data Center / High Frequency	Data Center

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9575F launched at $11791 MSRP, while the EPYC 9655 debuted at $11852. On MSRP ($11791 vs $11852), the EPYC 9575F is $61 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9575F delivers 12.5 pts/$ vs 13.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 9655 — making the EPYC 9655 the 5% better value option.